The Rutten Law Firm, APC

The Rutten Law Firm, APC employment law attorneys

Call Today: 818-308-5945

Standing Strong For Employee Rights

Begin A Consultation

Posts tagged "sexual orientation discrimination"

How to recognize sexual orientation based discrimination at work

Like many other forms of discrimination, discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is illegal under California and federal law. The first step to preventing discrimination at work is understanding your rights.

Advantages of Suing for Harassment Under FEHA

California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) offers plaintiffs many advantages over its federal counterpart, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These advantages are particularly significant in the area of harassment.

Continued progress for transgender employees in federal government jobs

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) recently found that the Department of Army engaged in gender identity (transgender) discrimination against Tamara Lusardi, after Lusardi announced she was transitioning from male to female. The OSC is an independent federal investigative and prosecutorial agency tasked mainly with protecting federal employees from prohibited personnel practices (PPP) in violation of 5 U.S.C. § 2302. This particular law is limited to federal employees but it contains the same basic principles as the sections of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which relate to employment discrimination.

Federal sex discrimination case: Male's right to wear jewelry at work

In a sexual harassment related case, a federal court in Alabama has permitted a male's sex-bias claim to proceed against a women's accessories company, Charming Charlie, after the company's manager made sexist and sexually harassing comments about men during the hiring process. Thereafter, the company offered the prospective employee a position but failed to give him a start date. The case is Owen v. Charming Charlie, No. 13-S-1009-S, 2013 WL 3968658 (N.D. Ala. July 31, 2013). According to the plaintiff employee, Courtney Owen, a male plaintiff, applied for a retail position at a Charming Charlie store. The manager of the store called him and offered a job interview. During the interview, the manager told Owen that she rarely hires males. Owen claims she further stated that men typically "don't like" the company's policy requiring all sales associates to wear six accessories while working." Owen claims he replied that he had no problem with the six accessory requirement, whereupon the hiring manager stated again that men typically do not like and "can't do" the dress code. She then told Owen that she "might be willing" to hire his on a temporary basis, and that if he followed the dress code, he "might" be hired on a permanent basis. The company sent Owen an offer letter the next day, together with the hiring documents. Owen completed the documents as requested and received a telephone message to join the "set-up team" to prepare for the grand opening of a new store. Owen attempted several times to follow up, but never heard back from the company. Owen then complained for sex discrimination/sexual harassment with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for having been denied employment on the basis of sex. Owen alleged in his complaint that "the accessories requirement and other policies have a disparate impact on male applicants and employees and intentionally discriminate against male applicants and employees, without sufficient business justification, and [defendant] knows this. In addition to its policies having a disparate impact and weeding out male applicants, respondent engages in a pattern and practice of intentional discrimination against males in the hiring process and in the terms and conditions of employment of any males who are hired and uses its accessories policy as a pretext for intentional discrimination in hiring and in other terms and conditions of employment."

The best sexual harassment lawyers - How do you find one?

If you are the victim of workplace sexual harassment, does it matter who you hire to represent you?  Of course it does.  

Workplace sexual harassment - What damages can you recover?

The right to work free from harassment or discrimination based on sex or gender is a civil right in California.  Sexual harassment comes in many forms and includes unwanted and unwelcome visual, verbal or physical conduct that is of a sexual nature or sex-based including requests for sexual favors.  Employees, independent contractors and even job applicants are protected. Both the company and the harasser are liable to the victim of harassment, although, different rules apply depending on whether the harasser is a co-worker or a supervisor.  Companies are strictly liable for harassment by supervisors and managers.  

Supreme Court's Finds Against Same Sex Marriage Ban in a Blow to Sexual Orientation Discrmination

The United States Supreme Court struck down laws against same sex marriage today.  This ruling is a giant step in the evolution of our society away from sexual orientation discrimination.  

Email Us For a Response

Do You Have A Question
About Your Case?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

The Rutten Law Firm, APC

The Rutten Law Firm, APC employment law attorneys

Do you need help from an experienced attorney?

Contact us right now to schedule your consultation.

The Rutten Law Firm, APC
4221 Coldwater Canyon Avenue
Studio City, CA 91604

Phone: 818-308-5945
Studio City Office Location

Review Us